“AND JUST LIKE THAT”

The Reboot of Sex and the City and the reboot of Financial Institutions’ Insurance Distribution is getting a lot of media coverage lately.

Financial Institutions (FI) Insurance Distribution, just like SATC is once more a “hot topic” of conversation in financial services. 
 
For the non-initiated, this new version of SATC begins 10 years after their last movie in 2010. The SATC
ladies have come back older, trying to navigate the changed culture and managing problems they never even dreamed they would encounter.

This also true for FI wrestling with their everchanging landscape; managing the quest for scale, seeking excellence in customer experience, integrating DEI and understanding the impact of ESG on their brand, are just a few elements that keep FI executives up at night.  Since the pandemic has
morphed and will probably continue to do so, this pandemic-induced growth in everything digital to enhance customer retention and the need for non-interest fee income, have also buoyed FI insurance distribution.
 
The form this resurgence takes is immaterial; whether it is mergers, acquisitions, organic development, outsourced, or new concepts designed for the smaller institutions, FI insurance distribution is thriving.
To give a bit of context:
 
1. “In 2021, broker mergers and acquisitions hit a fifth straight record year in the insurance distribution sector, with 798 transactions announced as of Jan. 3, 2022, a 12.2% increase compared with the 2020 announced deal total of 711.” (1) The prominent players are private equity backed; however, FI and
carriers are still in the acquisition mix. One explanation for FI’s continuing interest is the ability to
purchase the smaller regionals that are overlooked by the public brokers or equity -backed players. Cross selling to the agency’s insurance clients continues to be attractive.

 2. “Insured losses of $44 billion from COVID-19, so far represent the third largest cost to insurers of any catastrophe, behind Hurricane Katrina and the 9/11 attacks.” (2) Covid elevated the need for better life insurance, accident and sickness coverage and critical illness coverage for the first time in the public’s eyes. Third quarter YTD new sales for workplace life Insurance, disability income and supplemental health increased significantly in 2021 with growth rates ranging from 4 to 12 percent. (3)

3. Again, just like our SATC heroines on screen that are reinventing new careers, the fintech and insurtech revolution continues to evolve. Global insurtechs have raised a whopping $10.5 billion across 427 deals in 3Q’21 and this funding figure is already 48% greater than 2020’s year-end total. (4) Fintechs add to this number by blowing past 2020 total funding by 3Q21 for a total of $94.7 billion, a 96% increase. (5)

4. I was one of the original Board Members of the American Bankers Insurance Association. One of the key components of the Association was the annual conference that brought together FI interested in insurance distribution. The Conference has not happened in the last couple of years.  However, in 2021, a consortium of the American Bankers Association, North Carolina Bankers Association (where I recently helped to architect their insurance distribution strategy) has been formed with Stathis-Mittel Business Intelligence as managers. This leadership community will focus on helping FI to fulfill the insurance protection needs of their clients, and annual conferences are planned.
 
AND JUST LIKE THAT, these four trends are an indication that FI insurance distribution is embracing
transformation as advocated by Socrates, “The secret of change is to focus all your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new.”
 
I look forward to all the changes we will see in the FI industry in 2022 and, of course, the new episodes of Sex and the City!
 
What do your think? Reach out to me at carmen@cfeffroncompany.com , or 203.226.2645 with comments or questions.

(1) Business Insurance January 7, 2022, Marsh Berry Capital
(2)  Howden from Reuters quoted in Business Insurance, January 4, 2022
(3) LIMRA’s U.S. Workplace Life, Disability, and Supplemental Health Insurance Sales Surveys, Third    Quarter 2021.
(4) CB insights Insurtech Investing 3Q Report
(5) CB Insights State of Fintech Q3’21 Report

As a world-renowned chess master, Gerry Kasparov was used to winning. In fact, he simultaneously beat 32 computers in 1985.  Just 12 years later, in 1997 his life changed dramatically when he was crushed by IBM’s Big Blue $10 Million computer. Today his new book, Deep Thinking, Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins promotes embracing technology so it can enhance not just our chess game, but our business and personal lives.  
 
While I am a conscious subscriber to the elements of technology that enhance my life, I am becoming more cautious about the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in my day-to-day interactions with technology. As long as humans were still programing the code that runs the computer programs, I felt more comfortable that the outcomes have a level of integrity and a modicum of “humaneness”. However, I feel uncomfortable when the programs program themselves.  With the advent of neural networks and machine learning algorithms that mimic how the human neurons interact in our brains, the machines are now writing the rules, and artificial intelligence (AI) is commonplace, even when we are unaware of its presence.
 
For many years, it was kind of simple; programmers wrote the code and the machine would articulate the code in a human-friendly fashion. This felt right because we were in control of the outcomes as we did the programming. Of course, this is rather simplistic thinking when factoring in the motivations of “hackers and criminals” but cyber-crime is just one very negative byproduct of our digital dependence. Back in the 50’s, when the notorious bank robber Willie Sutton, was asked, “Why do you rob banks?”  He purportedly answered, “Because that is where the money is.” In the near future, banks can be robbed and the only entity that may be able to answer that question is an “algorithm” that no one understands.

A study conducted by researchers at the University of California- San Diego, estimated that people are inundated with approximately 34 GB (Gigabytes) of data daily. We are exposed to over 100,000 words a day and even thought we don't really read the words, they are reaching our eyes and ears. For you math whizzes that is 23 words per second during 12 waking hours. Ouch..., no wonder we find it hard to focus, make changes and discern valid, factual and relevant information. As a reaction to receiving this deluge of information some neuroscientists  believe that our brains may now be developing differently. They believe our brains are creating new neural connections ( mind maps) to react more quickly thereby reducing our ability for deeper thought and reflection.

This data supports and underscores an enormous challenge in any organizational change program; you must grab the attention of the people that need to change and make them aware of and desirous of creating modifications. Click here to read more...

That question can be answered with a very cautious yes, BUT...

Because trust is an essential ingredient in any long term relationship; personal, professional or political, the use of revolutionary instead of evolutionary means to coerce and manipulate change, means that extended-term success is jeopardized. In the sort-term, for an organizational change management program that has limited internal scope and needs to happen quickly, the lack of trust can be overcome with a few elements in place such as the following: 

​If change is the nature of life, both personal and organizational, then why is it our nature to resist change so vigorously? Over the years, my micro-view from having been involved in mergers and acquisitions, new product distribution, design and development, and enterprise redesign, is that there are two opposing forces at work within the human psyche.
If you are part of the leadership that is implementing the change in an organization, you may favor it, but if you are on the receiving end of the change, fear may make you resistant. In some cases, fear and favor reside in equal measures, no matter what side of the equation you are on. Knowing that without change, atrophy sets in, intellectually we accept change but hope it will happen to others and not to us.
George Bernard Shaw stated, “Progress is impossible without change and if you can’t change your mind, then you can’t change anything.”
So the question is how to address organizational change thoughtfully and favorably alter the minds of people that are resistant. Click here to find out how.